Too busy at work to tune into the Jeff Sessions confirmation hearing? Or maybe your rising blood pressure just makes tuning in ill-advised. No fear! We’ve got you covered with a round-up of the moments — and Tweets — you don’t want to miss.
The voting rights act, the KKK, and racism were recurring themes in the confirmation hearing of Senator Jeff Sessions. And that shouldn’t come as much of a surprise — after all, that’s the issue that kept him from the federal judiciary in 1986. Right from the start there were chanting protestors, dressed for the occasion:
Two protestors dressed as KKK members just got arrested for disrupting hearing. #NoSessions #StopSessions pic.twitter.com/fDzlaVoXaL
— NAACP (@NAACP) January 10, 2017
Pursuing The Pro Bono Story: A Conversation With Alicia Aiken
This Pro Bono Week, get inspired to give back with PLI’s Pursuing Justice: The Pro Bono Files, a one-of-a-kind podcast hosted by Alicia Aiken.
But they were media savvy:
The Code Pink protesters, interrupting one by one as usual, are also shouting out the date of an upcoming rally. #marketing #disrupt
— David Weigel (@daveweigel) January 10, 2017
Chrometa: Turning Time Into Billable Value For Modern Lawyers
Adoption of Chrometa represents more than a technological upgrade; it reflects a professional philosophy that values accuracy, transparency, and efficiency.
Jeff Sessions confronted the allegations head-on, condemning the “caricature” of him from 1986 as “damnably false”:
Jeff Sessions directly addressed allegations of racism: "These are damnably false charges" https://t.co/80HamZygaQ pic.twitter.com/idtcHRhgJn
— POLITICO (@politico) January 10, 2017
And during Lindsey Graham’s questioning, Sessions got an opportunity to talk about his feelings on being called a racist. Yes, that happened.
Graham notes the racisms claims about Sessions that have been raised, asking, "How does that make you feel?"
"It does not feel good."
— Chris “Law Dork” Geidner (@chrisgeidner) January 10, 2017
The Voting Rights Act was also discussed, not substantively, mind you, but it was enough for folks to mine Sessions’s history on the law:
When the Supreme Court gutted landmark civil rights legislation, the Voting Rights Act, Sessions said it was “good news…for the South."
— Rep. Barbara Lee (@RepBarbaraLee) January 10, 2017
But not everyone is convinced by the Sessions dance moves on the subject:
Sessions' attempt to explain his criticism of the Voting Rights Act is one part misleading, one part dead wrong. https://t.co/vvjbTIcMZl
— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjs_DC) January 10, 2017
This transitions neatly into voter ID laws, an area ripe for burns:
#Sessions says Texas voter ID law doesn’t appear to discriminate. Courts have disagreed multiple times. https://t.co/LMERTFbU0K
— Brennan Center (@BrennanCenter) January 10, 2017
A notable moment — especially for those still hopeful a Trump administration will “lock her [Hillary Clinton] up — was when Sessions said he’d recuse himself from any Clinton investigation:
Sessions in rehearsed exchange with Grassley says he would recuse himself from any investigation of Clinton email or Clinton Foundation.
— David Corn (@DavidCornDC) January 10, 2017
After all, the US should try to avoid the appearance of a banana republic:
Sessions: "This country does not punish its political enemies" Does PEOTUS know that?
— Kathryn Rubino (@Kathryn1) January 10, 2017
Al Franken’s questioning of Sessions was the most contentious of the hearing.
Stuart Smalley is really giving it to Foghorn Leghorn pic.twitter.com/Y8rvRaQtVD
— Thornton McEnery (@ThorntonMcEnery) January 10, 2017
Specifically, Sessions’s taking credit for cases in which he signed filings, but may not have been involved in the daily work, was questioned.
#Sessions In hearing, Franken unmistakably accuses him of misrepresentation; Sessions: I apologize if I was in error but I don't think I was https://t.co/YLhLNFYsl0
— Kenneth Jost (@jostonjustice) January 10, 2017
Senator Franken repeatedly noted he wasn’t a lawyer, but he knows resume padding when he sees it.
A fun moment was when Senator Sasse went off on how “confusing” executive orders have become:
Sen @BenSasse says there's a civic crisis in country cuz American school children have listened to too many GOP anti-Obama talking points.
— Josh Marshall (@joshtpm) January 10, 2017
Nuance can be a challenge for children and Senators alike.
The letter 1,400 law professors signed objecting to Sessions nomination also got a shout out:
.@LindseyGrahamSC – "The age old question: Can you be confirmed Attorney General over the opposition of 1,400 law professors."
— Josh Blackman (@JoshMBlackman) January 10, 2017
The answer, inevitably, will be yes.
Sessions was also questioned about Roe v. Wade, marriage equality, and the Violence Against Women Act. The theme of his comments seems to be something along the lines of “I don’t like the law, but I’ll follow it” — and not everyone is convinced:
Jeff Sessions Says Law Allowing Abortion Deserves Respect And Will Be Followed https://t.co/soctIQhqph via @o_ema
— Zoe Tillman (@ZoeTillman) January 10, 2017
Sen. Sessions in fact voted against #VAWA, now the law of the land. Will he protect ALL victims of sexual assault? https://t.co/lCIIE7yNPX
— Sen. Patrick Leahy (@SenatorLeahy) January 10, 2017
Not that too much comfort can be drawn from that stance:
https://twitter.com/jbarro/status/818844022009712640
The best law school moment happened curtesy of Senator Lee, a nice RAP reference:
Drink! Rule against perpetuities mention #Sessionshearing
— Kathryn Rubino (@Kathryn1) January 10, 2017
COME ON MIKE LEE STOP BEING A GUNNER FOR JUST ONE SECOND
— Mike Sacks (@MikeSacksEsq) January 10, 2017
But in all this chatter, let’s not ignore the wisdom of the one, the only, Axl Rose:
Good people don't listen to, acknowledge, nominate or elect people like Senator Jeff Sessions.
— Axl Rose (@axlrose) November 18, 2016
Kathryn Rubino is an editor at Above the Law. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).