
Free Speech By Numbers
The weird, numerical significance of 45.
The weird, numerical significance of 45.
This is the second time in six weeks in which a right-of-publicity class action against Avvo has been dismissed.
Discover five practical ways to harness AI and eliminate busywork—so you can focus more on your clients and less on repetitive tasks.
Barack Obama knows something about con law.
No, "safe spaces" aren't ruining education.
Setting a trap for the rats infesting his docket.
* "NEW CIVILITY WATCH: Dem Senate candidate and former Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland: Scalia's death 'happened at a good time.'" [Instapundit] * A Skull and Bones society for top NYC law firms? Professor Rick Swedloff discusses a secretive group whose membership includes some of Biglaw's biggest names. [SSRN] * A notable new petition (filed by Professor Orin Kerr and Marcia Hofmann) in a high-profile appeal about the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. [Volokh Conspiracy] * Donald Trump's infamous "Second Amendment" quip is protected by the First Amendment -- but just barely, according to Professor Noah Feldman. [Bloomberg View via How Appealing] * Jury consultant Roy Futterman of DOAR wonders: is concern about prejudicing jurors actually driving them to using the internet for decision-making? [Big Law Business] * Could the ABA someday lose its power to accredit law schools? Steven J. Harper thinks its day of reckoning is coming closer. [The Belly of the Beast]
Juno has consistently secured the best private loan deals for students at the Top MBA programs since 2018—now they’re bringing that same offer to law students, at no cost. Students can check their personalized offers at juno.us/atl This article is for general information only and is not personal financial advice.
Trump threatens a lawsuit... the response is a devastating lesson in defamation law.
A way to fight back when litigation is used as a weapon against free speech.
You can’t have a better example of where the principle of a thing is more important than the individuals who might benefit from it.
A very interesting area of law, but also a total mess.
Swing by Booth 800 for a look at the latest in AI-powered case management.
Who knew that commercial speech and the First Amendment could provoke such a strong reaction?
* On the importance of having your criminal clients dressed for court, not for jail. [Katz Justice] * An eight-justice Supreme Court has inspired some fanfic! No, there aren't any group sex scenes, it isn't that kind of fanfic. [Medium] * A group of law professors have now joined Massholes in supporting Tom Brady's Hail Mary for a Second Circuit rehearing. [Profootball Talk] * We need to protect the free speech rights of teachers too. [Bloomberg View] * A Trump presidency will threaten the rule of law, at least according to a bunch of libertarian legal scholars. [New York Times] * Florida banned Medicaid patients from using Planned Parenthood, and now PP is fighting back in court. [Slate] * There seems to be more legal bad news for Uber. [Law and More] * Ammon and Ryan Bundy still don't think the rules apply to them, even when they are in jail. [Huffington Post]
* Will wearing makeup increase your earning potential? (Yes, they only mean for women, the patriarchy is a real bitch like that.) [Corporette] * Ken Starr says he is resigning from his position as Baylor chancellor "as a matter of conscience." Yup, he still plans on teaching at the law school. [ESPN] * Donald Trump's terrible comments about Judge Gonzalo Curiel are all part of a branding exercise. [Lawyers, Guns and Money] * Law professor Kimberlé Crenshaw is fighting to make people remember the women killed by police. #SayHerName [The Guardian] * The cleanup after a storm can be even more challenging than weathering the storm in the first instance. [Katz on Justice] * Has Election 2016 convinced you our electoral system is hopelessly broken? Here are the best ways to fix it. [Brennan Center for Justice] * Reflections from Richard Levick on Peter Thiel v. Gawker (including commentary from our very own David Lat). [Forbes]
It may be offensive, but when is it a crime?
Columnist Tamara Tabo respectfully dissents from the recent decision to remove reader comments from Above the Law.