While writing a post for True/Slant about child porn enthusiasts who used a private social network to trade their kiddie pics, we stumbled across the website of Lindeman, Alvarado, & Frye. The Texas criminal defense firm has a kiddie porn practice group.
We think the photo accompanying the description of the group is a little off….
UPDATE: Other practice groups include disturbing images, as pointed out by commenters.
The firm’s criminal defense practice represents:
Clients charged with a full range of sex crimes in which children were the alleged victims, including: Child sexual assault, Child sexual abuse or molestation, Indecency with a child, Possession of child pornography (kiddie porn), Internet stalking or sexual solicitation of a minor.
Context Windows In Legal AI And Why Content Still Determines Quality
Legal teams ask a practical question. If large language models are so capable, why does legal AI still depend on curated content, and why does surfacing that content matter so much?
Here’s the “Child Sexual Assault & Internet Solicitiation [sic] of a Minor” page:
Does the firm really need to include a picture of a potential victim of the crime? This is like using a photo of a bullet-ridden body to advertise murder defense, or photos of the mangled victims of a car accident on a DUI defense attorney’s website.
At least she’s clothed…
UPDATE: As noted by commenters, there are some other questionable images. Here’s a few of them:
For defense against Rape & Sexual Assault:
And for drug charges:
This one may be the worst. For defense against domestic violence charges:
Gavel bang on those last three, commenters 17, 27, and 44.
Kiddie porn enthusiasts make use of private social networking site [True/Slant]
Child Sexual Assault & Internet Solicitiation [sic] of a Minor [Lindeman Alvarado & Frye]