Non-Sequiturs

Non-Sequiturs: 12.08.16

* Handicapping the race for the Supreme Court vacancy. [Bloomberg BNA] * Can redecorating courthouses make a difference to justice? [Katz Justice] * An illuminating interview with the lawyer behind Loving v. Virginia. [Coverage Opinions] * States' rights are all well and good when talking about the emission of pollutants, but not when it comes to marijuana. Wait -- what? [Slate] * Was the end of Gawker inevitable? [Law and More] * Will gun owners in Ohio have more rights than LGBT people? [The Trace]

By Kathryn Rubino on December 08, 2016 7:15 pm

marijuana gavel * Handicapping the race for the Supreme Court vacancy. [Bloomberg BNA]

* Can redecorating courthouses make a difference to justice? [Katz Justice]

* An illuminating interview with the lawyer behind Loving v. Virginia. [Coverage Opinions]

How Strong Is Your Firm’s Financial Visibility?

Discover how to gain more control over your firm’s finances and unlock smarter growth strategies—take a quick financial visibility quiz designed for law firms.

By The MyCase Team

* States’ rights are all well and good when talking about the emission of pollutants, but not when it comes to marijuana. Wait — what? [Slate]

* Was the end of Gawker inevitable? [Law and More]

* Will gun owners in Ohio have more rights than LGBT people? [The Trace]