When people mock attorneys for making everything in life unduly complex… this is what they mean.
A charity fundraiser in Virginia has some very, very, very tiny fine print, but that first line of eligibility limitation is quite important.
[pdfjs-viewer url=”https://abovethelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2018/03/Hampton-Roads-Dream-Home-Ticket-Form.pdf”]
Context Windows In Legal AI And Why Content Still Determines Quality
Legal teams ask a practical question. If large language models are so capable, why does legal AI still depend on curated content, and why does surfacing that content matter so much?
“To be eligible to purchase a ticket, you must be at least 18 years old and a living resident of the United States.”
Is there a zombie problem in Virginia I don’t know about?
And before you suggest that the requirement is meant to exclude someone’s estate from winning, this isn’t a limitation on eligibility to win, it’s a limit on who is eligible to purchase the ticket in the first place. So if you find yourself in Virginia, you’ve been warned that the undead are trying to win a new house.
Humans in the Loop: The People Powering Trusted Legal AI
As the use of artificial intelligence permeates legal practice, a critical question confronts every legal professional who uses these tools: Can I trust this?
Joe Patrice is an editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news.