Late last week, the excellent BarExamTracker Twitter account posted an ominous warning about shady tactics that some fierce defenders of the broken status quo might deploy against law school graduates seeking a diploma privilege option to avoid taking an in-person exam in the middle of a global pandemic.
Or, perhaps, it’s more fair to say “American” since most of the rest of the globe seems to be getting a handle on this crisis while the United States digs in and just embraces that things are going to get much worse.
https://twitter.com/BarExamTracker/status/1278520853005774848?s=20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09e7b/09e7ba87543acf3ad991076a9e73f6d6e2077a2f" alt=""
The Hidden Threat: How Fake Identities used by Remote Employees Put Your Business at Risk—and How to Defend Against This
Based on our experience in recent client matters, we have seen an escalating threat posed by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) information technology (IT) workers engaging in sophisticated schemes to evade US and UN sanctions, steal intellectual property from US companies, and/or inject ransomware into company IT environments, in support of enhancing North Korea’s illicit weapons program.
When I first saw this, I appreciated the concern but refused to believe that anyone in a position of authority would really stoop to something like that. Advocating for diploma privilege is an exercise of free speech and a sign of genuine professional engagement, not a series of embezzlement convictions.
But it turns out, I’d been giving the powers-that-be far too much credit because they had already embarked down the road of intimidating critics with C&F threats.
A recent law school grad who I won’t name because of the threatening atmosphere posted a response sent to the entire graduating class from her law school:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9e2e/f9e2e28c7683a499bcf9bee44e617c33a7419283" alt=""
The Fifth-Year Dilemma: Do I Stay Or Do I Go (In-House)?
How to make the right decision, and why there might be another way to shape a fulfilling legal career on your own terms.
That… certainly sounds like a threat.
It also lends oxygen to the pernicious worldview that criticizing those in power amounts to “cyberbullying.” It’s as close to bullying as the toughest kid on the playground complaining that he cut his hand bashing your face. When someone signs up to a position of responsibility, they’ve signed up to face criticism and they don’t get to whine when someone questions their decisions.
Frankly, it’s shameful that anyone involved in the profession would even consider such a move and the law school’s proper response to the suggestion should not be to counsel quiet but to evoke its considerable clout to offer pro bono representation of any student who thought they were a victim of retaliation for voicing legitimate criticism.
But it’s 2020 and I’m getting used to feeling let down by the profession.
Joe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.