Biglaw Partner Recommended For Stayed Suspension Following Sexual Relationship With Client
With the condition she avoid further misconduct.
Jessica Mager, a partner at Taft Law, was in some hot water for engaging in a sexual relationship with a client. In October of 2019, Mager, whose practice focuses on family law, represented a client in his divorce proceeding when the Ohio Office of Disciplinary Counsel said she engaged in a sexual relationship with the client in violation of the Ohio Rules of Professional Conduct, “specifically Prof.Cond.R. 1.8(j) [prohibiting a lawyer from soliciting or engaging in sexual activity with a client unless a consensual relationship existed between them when the client-lawyer relationship commenced].”
Two days after that sexual encounter, the client got into a verbal and physical altercation with his wife. The client was later found dead by suicide.
Last month, the Ohio Supreme Court’s Board of Professional Conduct recommended a stayed six-month suspension, with the condition Mager refrain from further misconduct. Mager has agreed to this discipline. As reported by ABA Journal:
The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm
Mager stipulated to violation of a conduct rule that bars sexual activity with a client unless a consensual relationship existed when the client-lawyer relationship began.
The board noted that Mager had no prior discipline, the misconduct involved a single client, and she displayed a cooperative attitude in the proceedings. Several judges, lawyers and former clients also submitted letters attesting to her good character.
Mager previously said that in her two-decade career she “earned a reputation for integrity. However, two years ago, during a difficult time in my life, I made a serious error in judgment. I have no one to blame but myself, and I accept full responsibility for my actions.”
Mager’s attorney, Jonathan Coughlan of the Coughlan Law Firm, noted this is not a final determination. “There has been no decision,” Coughlan said. “This is simply a joint recommendation to the Supreme Court of Ohio, which makes the decision. In fact, the joint recommendation happened some time ago.”
Sponsored
The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm
Generative AI In Legal Work — What’s Fact And What’s Fiction?
How Transactional Lawyers Can Better Serve (And Maintain) Their Clients
Generative AI In Legal Work — What’s Fact And What’s Fiction?
Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of The Jabot podcast, and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).
Sponsored
AI’s Impact On Law Firms Of Every Size
