(Image via Getty)
Ed. Note: A weekly roundup of just a few items from Howard Bashman’s How Appealing blog, the Web’s first blog devoted to appellate litigation. Check out these stories and more at How Appealing.
“Judge Dodging: Apple loses Mandamus Transfer Action This Time.” Dennis Crouch has this post at his “Patently-O” blog.
Inside The Minds Working At US Midsize Law Firms: 2025 Priorities Revealed
Midsize firms want smarter tech, not more. Our 2025 industry report shows how the right tools—and strategy—can drive growth, efficiency, and better client outcomes.
“Could the Supreme Court Blindside the FDA on the First Amendment?” James M. Beck has this post at his “Drug & Device Law” blog.
“Comstockery: How Government Censorship Gave Birth to the Law of Sexual and Reproductive Freedom, and May Again Threaten It.” Law professors Reva Siegel and Mary Ziegler have posted this article at SSRN.
“Alliance Defending Freedom Lawyer Enraged By Good, Correct Criticism Of Alliance Defending Freedom; The fallout over the Idaho attorney general’s sketchy arrangement with the activist legal organization is turning right-wing ideologues into mediocre bloggers”: Susan Rinkunas has this essay online at Balls and Strikes.
“Judge approves $125 million PACER fees settlement with US judiciary”: Nate Raymond of Reuters has this report.
“Pulsifer v. United States as Permissive Interpretation”: Richard M. Re has this post at his blog, “Re’s Judicata.”