StatPack Extended OT ’24
A deep dive with everything we couldn't fit into the StatPack.
A deep dive with everything we couldn't fit into the StatPack.
Data and analysis bring clarity to the question of whether Barrett is the weak link on a conservatively dominated Court.
Enhance your legal skills to advocate for survivors of intimate partner violence.
Perhaps the most (or at least one of the most) important duties of the president is judicial appointments.
Sophisticated writing software with AI components can now tell you how to write like particular judges by engineering writing that mirrors stylistic features of the judges’ writings.
Overall, these justices reflect the ideological spectrum of the Supreme Court.
This analysis underscores that influence within judicial discourse is more multifaceted than meets the eye.
A new proposal would let wealthy foreign nationals secure an opportunity for a U.S. green card with a $1 million 'gift' to the government, sparking legal and ethical debate.
Knowledge of how justices engage in oral arguments compared to their written opinions can inform legal practitioners on how to better present cases.
The justices clearly assert their uniqueness with their concurrences and as this is on display, they show how the justices may be more different than meets the eye.
We recently used Optimized Legal Audio (OLA) to try to read the tea leaves on the audio footprint of the SEC v. Jarkesy case. Here are the results.
Optimized Legal Audio is an artificial intelligence engine in its infancy that tries to hear what judges say, read the language they use, and through this to infer their relative preference for one attorney’s argument over another’s.
Adoption of Chrometa represents more than a technological upgrade; it reflects a professional philosophy that values accuracy, transparency, and efficiency.
Just how different is the start of this term compared with past terms?
With only a few spots at this upper echelon of Supreme Court practice, how do attorneys get repeat player experience?
A matrix for scoring the justices in terms of relative power.
Ranking the current justices.
The current Supreme Court seems to not only take its cues from conservative lower court judges, but particularly from Trump’s nominees.