The Modern Free Exercise Doctrine Is Inconsistent And Dishonest
A conversation about the free exercise doctrine generally and discussion on an important free exercise case heard by the Supreme Court this term.
A conversation about the free exercise doctrine generally and discussion on an important free exercise case heard by the Supreme Court this term.
It has become very interesting to see when kneeling at a football game is acceptable behavior.
Drawing on more than a decade of data, the report equips law firms and corporate legal teams with actionable insights to better assess risk, refine strategy, and anticipate outcomes in today’s evolving workplace disputes.
At least(?) it's only a dissent.
You know, to 'protect' the First Amendment.
It is difficult, if not impossible, to find greater hypocrisy on any issue than the kind exhibited by cancel culture alarmists.
First Amendment is cool and all, but have you tried state-mandated patriotic chanting?
With the addition of Uncover’s technology, the litigation software is delivering rapid innovation.
When Twitter blocked the current president, it was expected that his staunchest supporters would cry foul, but I was shocked to see reasonable people also express dire concern.
The false narrative of religious victimization appears to dominate at the Supreme Court, yet one district court judge has struck back.
Respect for pluralism is one thing, trying to make nonbeliever rights submissive to conservative religious views is entirely another.
Rudy was ready for his close-up in 2014.
Takeaways from a Legalweek panel on evolving malpractice risks.
No matter where you stand on the social or political spectrum, it is not hard for reasonable people to agree there are some societal issues that are troubling the citizenry.
If religious bigotry can deny foster children in a government program access to the best available caregivers, there is probably not much else religious bigots cannot take.
Cops get qualified immunity, but protestors owe a duty of care to cops? ¯_(ツ)_/¯
It's a 'conspiracy!' (It's not a conspiracy.)
If religion and government were kept separate as originally intended, no Supreme Court nominee’s beliefs could ever be a legitimate issue.