Ginni Thomas Really REALLY Doesn’t Want Any Supreme Court Reform
File this under 'unsurprising bullsh*t.'
File this under 'unsurprising bullsh*t.'
Too racist for Turning Point USA, just right for Clarence Thomas.
Enhance your legal skills to advocate for survivors of intimate partner violence.
There are several solid candidates for the role.
You can really only use 'I didn't know' as an excuse one time.
Make your own card and play along at home.
This is a real problem for the integrity of the Court... not that anything will be done about it.
Those who’ve adopted legal-specific systems are seeing big benefits.
Although the ethical obligations of Supreme Court Justices are notoriously lax and ill-defined, disclosure of gifts at the level Harlan Crow has bestowed on Clarence Thomas would seemingly be the bare minimum.
How *not* to respond to an ethics crisis.
Are we actually getting an enforceable ethics code for the Supreme Court? Probably not, but it's a start.
The controversy over Ginni Thomas's advocacy work continues.
Adoption of Chrometa represents more than a technological upgrade; it reflects a professional philosophy that values accuracy, transparency, and efficiency.
This is not the ethics scandal the Times thinks it is.
If you know what to look for, this report says a whole lot.
It’s only the beginning.
Unsurprising these folks want to watch it burn.
Some pretty interesting stuff in Ginni Thomas's January 6th Committee testimony.