Larren M. Nashelsky
-
Biglaw, Bonuses, MoneyAssociate Bonus Watch: Mo' Money At MoFo
General sentiment about bonuses at Morrison & Foerster is positive. -
Bankruptcy, Pro Bono, Public Interest, TechnologyCan Technology Automate Your Rights? Upsolve Thinks So
A story of legal innovation that should tickle the hearts of all you idealists. 
SponsoredCurbing Client And Talent Loss With Productivity Tech
Law firms must leverage technology to curb client attrition and talent loss, enhancing efficiency and aligning with evolving expectations for lasting success.-
Bar Exams, BiglawWhat Happens To Incoming Biglaw Associates Who Fail The Bar Exam?
Uh-oh! Would they still have jobs with starting salaries of $180K if they failed?
-
Biglaw, Bonuses, Lateral Moves, Money, Partner Issues
Associate Bonus Watch: Morrison & Foerster (Non-NYC)
How are MoFo's bonuses beyond New York looking these days? -
Ask the Experts, Biglaw, Books, Movies, Partner Issues, Pro Bono
The ATL Interrogatories: 10 Questions with Larren Nashelsky of Morrison & Foerster
Larren Nashelsky of Morrison & Foerster shares his insights into the legal profession. -
Associate Bonus Watch 2012, Biglaw, Bonuses, Money, Partner Issues
Associate Bonus (and New Partner) Watch: Morrison & Foerster
Opinion is divided on bonuses at MoFo. Which side has the better of the argument? -
Biglaw, Football, Gender, In-House Counsel, Kids, Law Schools, Money, Morning Docket, Sentencing Law, State Judges, State Judges Are Clowns, Utah
Morning Docket: 10.19.12
* Congrats to Larren Nashelsky for being one bad ass MoFo. He’s taking over as Chair of Morrison & Foerster, and claims the firm’s had “some of [its] best years in recent years.” [San Francisco Business Times]
* Macho, macho man! You’ve got to be, a macho man to work at Dechert. An ex-associate says he was fired for using FMLA time and blames the firm’s “macho culture” in his retaliation complaint. [National Law Journal]
* Sorry, but you make too much damn money. Utah’s Judicial Conduct Commission recommended a judge for censure because his salary was “in excess of the amount allowed by law.” [Standard-Examiner]
* “We’re all reacting to Darwinian pressures in the market and from students.” Maybe that’s why law schools are adding more classes having to do with careers as in-house counsel. [Corporate Counsel]
* Jerry Sandusky has asked Judge John Cleland to reconsider his 30-60 year prison sentence because he thinks it’s excessive. Strange, because some people would argue it wasn’t excessive enough. [Bloomberg]
