If You Can’t Publish Racist Law Review Articles, What’s Even The Point Of Law School?
Law professors throw epic fit after law review editors propose 'edits.'
Law professors throw epic fit after law review editors propose 'edits.'
It's a logical fallacy issue-spotter!
Legal work isn’t slowing down, and the firms that win won’t be the ones working harder — they’ll be the ones working smarter.
Amy Wax finally took her racially insulting behavior far enough that the school had to step in.
And have *never* graduated in the top quarter as far as she can remember.
One story loomed over 2017 for Penn Law. But you wouldn't know it from the dean's letter.
At least it's an ethos.
Once you’ve got your law degree, how do you keep your professional skills up to date? Share your perspective in this brief survey, and you may be eligible to win a $250 gift card.
* Federal law enforcement's crackdown on NCAA coaches has likely brought an end to Rick Pitino's career. That said, we thought his career was over when we all learned that Louisville hired hookers for recruits so maybe he still has a shot. [ESPN] * Law firm mergers continue at a record place. Yep, there's no fundamental market weakness here at all. [Am Law Daily] * DOJ lawyers face an unpleasant grilling at the Second Circuit. Maybe someday Sessions can disinvite judges he doesn't want criticizing his unsupported legal theories. [Slate] * Women losing pregnancies while detained by the administration. I'd say we're going to look back on this era of immigration policy in horror, but we can probably go ahead and be horrified now. [Huffington Post] * The USD Alumni Board has weighed in on the Wax/Alexander op-ed. They take a "let's all come together" approach, which isn't wrong as much as it seems asymmetric. When one-side throws bombs about cultural superiority, decrying divisiveness puts the onus on the wrong side side to move. [Motions Online] * The most likely grants from the long conference. [Empirical SCOTUS] * Here's how you get $4 billion in punitive damages (hint: be in Texas). [Law.com]
Penn Law alumni speak up about stamping out bias.
Law professor says critics can't "read, analyze, and act."
What, exactly, were these law professors really trying to say? LawProfBlawg has an idea...
Grounded in authoritative content and verified at every step, Protégé is the only legal AI tool that delivers work you can trust—without exception.
When two law professors wrote a dog whistle of an editorial, students stood up. And the students deserve everyone's support.
Ripping racist op-ed isn't disrespectful, it's necessary.
Professors think things were better when women and minorities just acted more like white guys.