Morning Docket: 03.21.16
* What's the difference between the late Justice Antonin Scalia and Chief Judge Merrick Garland, his potential replacement? "[He] always sounds the same. Most of the time, he is very even-toned, not aggressive.” For starters, Scalia's dissents were usually fiery and entertaining, while Garland's dissents tend to be very respectful and courteous. [Washington Post] * "[T]here were errors and flaws in the way Thomas Jefferson carried out their research." An expert retained by Anna Alaburda in her suit against Thomas Jefferson Law testified that the methods the law school used to collect grads' job data were improper and could have caused some inaccurate info to be reported. [Courthouse News Service] * Donald Trump's presidential campaign -- and his path to the White House -- may be interrupted by a pesky fraud trial over his now defunct real estate school. The Donald will likely be asked to testify by New York AG Eric Schneiderman, and if he pleads the Fifth, it could have YUGE implications on his defense strategy. [WSJ Law Blog] * “When someone — or something — is going away, there are usually some people that want to get it before it goes away, for whatever reason." Racist memorabilia? Harvard Law is trying to quickly eliminate all ties to its controversial shield, but its bookstore will be slowly selling off all remaining merchandise bearing the symbol. [Boston Globe] * "The average graduate cannot expect to make enough in the years following graduation to even hope to make a dent in the student loans they take on from going to law school. And that's if they can even pass the bar and find a job as an attorney." Law profs face buyouts, but their students aren't in a much better position. [Northwest Indiana Times]
