Alberto Gonzales, Department of Justice, Politics, Senate Judiciary Committee, U.S. Attorneys Offices

Alberto Gonzales: In the Hot Seat (Part 2)

Alberto Gonzales 2 Attorney General Alberto R Gonzales Above the Law blog.jpgWe’re picking up with where we left off, in our liveblogging of Attorney General Alberto Gonzales’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
10:50: Sen. Herb. Kohl is REALLY going after AGAG. He cites poll data showing that approximately half of the American public wants Gonzales to resign.
Kohl is in essence asking: Why are you still here? He suggests to Gonzales that these poll results matter, because American people’s perceptions of the DOJ and whether justice is being done are very important.
Gonzales has a good line here: “You’re right, Senator. This is not about Alberto Gonzales.” He then says it’s about the work the DOJ is doing (to “protect our children,” of course).
11:00: Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) tosses a bunch of softballs in AGAG’s direction. He’s the most friendly questioner of the morning thus far. He also notes that some time ago, a Democratic senator predicted that Gonzales would be gone as AG within a week. “And yet here you are, still Attorney General, a month later. And I’m glad to see that.”
11:08: Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) is up now. Her lilac blazer stands out in the sea of dark suits.
Feinstein tries to zero in on the precise extent of Gonzales’s involvement. Great line: “Who was the Decider?”
We love ourselves some DiFi!
Okay, time for a 10-minute recess — the first of the morning.
And now we’re back. More discussion, after the jump.

During the break, from a reader, regarding Feinstein’s “Who was the Decider?” question:

“I’m just surprised AG didn’t respond to the decider question honestly, and describe in luscious detail the BDSM relationship between him and Bush. AG’s (obviously) the sub…”

And also another good point, concerning Senator Leahy directing visitors in the gallery to put down their signs:

No snark about Leahy playing middle school vice principal: “Now you kids stop playing around with those signs, or I’ll have to take them away!”

11:35: Back to the Republican side. Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) asks AGAG what he would have done differently. Gonzales says he would have had the Deputy Attorney General, Paul McNulty, more involved in the process.
HA. So maybe McNulty could take more of the blame with him, when he leaves the DOJ?
11:40: Cornyn asks AGAG about the controversial case of the two jailed Border Patrol agents. Not a comfortable subject for Gonzales; but it does take momentum away from the U.S. Attorney firing questioning.
11:52: Sen. Russ Feingold is up. He starts off kinda boring, but gets interesting — and harsh — near the end. Suggests that the rationales for the U.S. Attorney dismissals were made up after the fact.
12:00: Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) expresses frustration at AGAG’s lack of recollection about a certain meeting at which the firings were discussed. AGAG repeatedly states that he has “searched [his] memory” but can’t remember more.
(Maybe AGAG should undergo hypnosis to see if memories can be recovered?)
AGAG lists the officials involved in the decisionmaking about which U.S. Attorneys to fire. Oooh, a shout-out to Monica Goodling!
12:05: Chairman Leahy again expresses annoyance at distracting people in the gallery. Senator Leahy — if these people can’t settle down, just have their asses booted!
12:08: Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and AGAG get into a heated argument about the extent to which U.S. Attorney Carol Lam (S.D. Cal.) was advised of concerns about her immigration prosecutions. This is getting juicy…
(Schumer is saucy, smirk-y, and a bit of a divo. Theatrical. Clearly relishing raking AGAG over the coals.)
12:15: Shouting match #3, between Schumer and Gonzales. It’s over the characterization of Kyle Sampson’s prior testimony concerning the “plan” to evade Senate confirmation for Tim Griffin (E.D. Ark.). Schumer tries to tag Gonzales with this; Gonzales cites Sampson’s testimony that he (Gonzales) thought the idea was “dumb.”
12:20: Now it’s the turn of Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). No, we don’t know if he’s gay. Here in DC, the gossip goes both ways.
12:26: A gavel is banged — loudly. Are those spectators acting up again?
12:36: A pseudo-shouting match. Good line from Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), in response to Gonzales’s claim that the Department shouldn’t be criticized for this: “That’s like saying that by criticizing the conduct of the war, we’re criticizing the soldiers!”
This provokes scattered applause in the gallery and shouting from antiwar protestors.
Gonzales’s response: Criticize me, fine; but don’t criticize the Department.
12:39: Lunch recess, until 2 p.m. Protestors are carrying signs that say “Resign!” They are shouting, “Fire Gonzales now!”
In the house: antiwar protest queen Cindy Sheehan.
As the gathering breaks up, some of the senators give interviews to the media. Sen. Specter: “I want to know who the hell was on the ‘murder boards’ [that prepared AGAG for today],” because his performance today has been unacceptable.
Earlier: Alberto Gonzales: In the Hot Seat (Part 1)

(hidden for your protection)

comments sponsored by

Show all comments

28 Responses to “Alberto Gonzales: In the Hot Seat (Part 2)”

  1. Anonymous says:

    “…sea of dark suits”
    Lat – the shooter at Va Tech wore a dark outfit…
    Have you no shame sir

  2. furious googler says:

    never heard about the border patrol agents. here’s what google produced

  3. Anonymous says:

    Sen. Feingold = Saucy!!!

  4. Hastings 4L says:

    Hastings is one of the greatest law schools in the world. After graduating from that fine institution, I earned two prestigious clerkships, one with a California Superior Court Judge in Bakersfield and, and another with a Bankruptcy Judge in San Luis Obispo.

  5. anon says:

    feingold is great and one of the sharpest senators around, not to mention an HLS grad, but pays his staff crap

  6. Loyola 2L2 aloyoL says:

    too bad about what he did to the first amendment

  7. Anonymous says:

    Sweet palindrome!

  8. Anonymous says:

    Watch how quickly David Lat takes this down: David Lat is handsome, and versatile.

  9. Anonymous says:

    Schumer sucks
    12:11, what palindrome?

  10. Kevin says:

    Loyola 2L2 aloyoL

  11. Anonymous says:

    12:14: You must be new to this board. Lat doesn’t moderate comments.
    He has allowed some truly awful comments to remain up. I wish he would moderate comments, especially the racist, sexist, and homophobic ones.

  12. Anonymous says:

    Personally, I oppose homosexual acts (tho being culturally gay is okay, I suppose). But I find this blog right on politically the blogger is very persuasive. Leahy is a uniformed jerk I think and Lat is not biased.

  13. Anonymous says:

    Justice = Gonzo ought to be rendered to GitMo – cut his clothes off, diaper him and put him on the Learjet to the sunny island paradise – then let him experience some stress positions and determine for himself if his conclusions were sound.

  14. Anonymous says:

    Murder boards?

  15. Anonymous says:

    4-16-07 = 9-11-01

  16. Anonymous says:

    12:39, you are a douchebag. Lat is RIDICULOUSLY biased. The blog is good nonetheless, but let us not pretend we don’t know where the blogger stands.

  17. Anona says:

    Lat, were there any digs about the missing Whitehouse emails? You’d think one of the Senators would throw it in there.

  18. Anonymous says:

    I think one of the Dems – either Schumer or Kennedy – got in a dig about the AWOL emails.
    But there wasn’t as much as you might expect. Maybe they’re saving it for after lunch.

  19. Anonymous says:

    4-16-07 = 9-11-01

  20. Math Wizard says:

    “4-16-07 = 9-11-01″
    Um… no.
    4-16-07 = -19
    9-11-01 = -3

  21. Pinball Wizard says:

    4-16-25 = free replay

  22. Pin-up Wizard says:

    36-24-36 = jackpot

  23. Lost Wizard says:

    4-8-15-16-23-42=End of the World

  24. Prime Wizard says:

    2-3-5-7-11-13-17=proof that humans are sentient

  25. Anonymous says:

    7-3-2-8-4-2-1-2-3-4 = my direct line at work

  26. Math nerd says:

    1-2-3-4 I don’t want your goddamn war
    5-6-7-8-9-10 I love you

  27. Edith says:

    Now it’s the turn of Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC). No, we don’t know if he’s gay. Here in DC, the gossip goes both ways.
    My husband and I have a game whenever we hear a certain kind of lilting southern voice: “Gay? Or Carolina?” All men from the Carolinas ping my gaydar, so who knows?

Leave a Reply

Our Sites

  • Above the Law
  • How Appealing
  • ATL Redline
  • Breaking Defense
  • Breaking Energy
  • Breaking Gov
  • Dealbreaker
  • Fashonista