The Reema Bajaj story has been highly entertaining. The amount of lewd comments, jokes, and puns that can be made about a lawyers and prostitution is endless. I mean, lawyers are kind of like prostitutes in the best of times.
Here, during the worst of times, it sure feels like the difference between servicing a client for $100 and being a prostitute is nil.
And if there is something that a lawyer is doing to make money, you know her law school will try to take credit in some way…
Schenck Price Competes Smarter With Lexis+ With Protégé
LexisNexis sat down with John Ursin, Managing Partner at Schenck Price, to learn how the firm is using legal AI to strengthen client service and daily legal work.
This week’s comment of the week imagines how Reema Bajaj’s law school reacted to her guilty plea. It’s from our initial post about her plea:
Upon finding out that Reema was paid $100 for sex, Northern Illinois University College of Law immediately updated Ms. Bajaj’s status as “employed.”
At least, I think this is an imagination.
AI Is Reshaping Legal Practice—But Tools Aren’t The Real Differentiator.
Explore the mindset, cultural shifts, and training strategies that define the AI‑savvy lawyer, revealing why human judgment, standardized competence, and integrated learning—not technology alone—will shape the future of the profession.
You know the drill, tell us where to send your T-shirt, commenter “Grimes.”
Earlier: Reema Bajaj: The Morning After (Including revelations about Reema from a friend.)
Down Goes Bajaj: Reema Pleads Guilty To Prostitution