Corporations Are People, Now They Can Lie

A recent D.C. Circuit decision gives corporations more rights.

To support the conflict minerals disclosure rule, the dissent argues that the rule is valid because the United States is thick with laws forcing “[i]ssuers of securities” to “make all sorts of disclosures about their products.” Charles Dickens had a few words about this form of argumentation: “‘Whatever is is right’; an aphorism that would be as final as it is lazy, did it not include the troublesome consequence, that nothing that ever was, was wrong.”

— Judge A. Raymond Randolph, writing for the majority in National Association of Manufacturers v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, holding that publicly traded corporations have a First Amendment right to not disclose if their products contain conflict minerals from war-torn Democratic Republic of the Congo, striking down a provision in Dodd-Frank requiring such disclosure. Commentators worry this opens the door to First Amendment challenges by corporations over a wide range of transparency and sunshine laws.

Sponsored