Move for a directed verdict, my son.
A Texas judge, Jack Robison, interrupted jury deliberations to tell the jurors that God told him that the defendant was not guilty. From the Austin-American Statesmen:
A Comal County judge said God told him to intervene in jury deliberations to sway jurors to return a not guilty verdict in the trial of a Buda woman accused of trafficking a teen girl for sex.
Judge Jack Robison apologized to jurors for the interruption, but defended his actions by telling them “when God tells me I gotta do something, I gotta do it,” according to the Herald-Zeitung in New Braunfels.
Schenck Price Works Smarter with Lexis+ AI and Protégé
LexisNexis sat down with John Ursin, Managing Partner at Schenck Price, to learn how the firm is using legal AI to strengthen client service and daily legal work.
The jury defied God, or at least whoever Judge Robinson was talking to, and convicted Gloria Romero-Perez of “continuous trafficking of a person.” They later sentenced her to 25 years in prison, but by that point Judge Robinson had recused himself.
I… imagine this will trigger some kind of state ethics review. Religion aside, when judges start admitting to being guided by VOICES THAT ONLY THEY CAN HEAR… that’s a good time to reconsider a person’s fitness for the bench.
And, for any wayward monks reading, no, directives from God are not admissible in court. It is the definition of hearsay. It’s a statement, not made by the witness while testifying at the trial, offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. The other side should have been allowed to cross-examine… God… before the judge entered his statements into the record.
However, since the defendant was accused of CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING, I suppose you could argue that God’s missive was a “statement against interest,” and thus eligible for an exception to the hearsay rule.
AI Is Reshaping Legal Practice—But Tools Aren’t The Real Differentiator.
Explore the mindset, cultural shifts, and training strategies that define the AI‑savvy lawyer, revealing why human judgment, standardized competence, and integrated learning—not technology alone—will shape the future of the profession.
Expect this hypothetical to be coming to a 1L Evidence exam near you. In Texas.
In a normal state, you’ll probably see this on the MPRE:
What should you do if your judge starts speaking to God during the trial?
A: Object.
B: Request a mistrial.
C: GET OUT OF THERE. GET OUT OF THERE BEFORE THE RITUAL SACRIFICES START!
Texas judge interrupts jury, says God told him defendant is not guilty [Austin-American Statesman]
Elie Mystal is the Executive Editor of Above the Law and the Legal Editor for More Perfect. He can be reached @ElieNYC on Twitter, or at [email protected]. He will resist.