
(Photo By Michael Reynolds-Pool/Getty Images)
Did you tune out after work last night? Maybe you shut off your Twitter notifications and settled down for an evening of guilty pleasure TV, all without finding out the latest in the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation saga. Well, you missed a doozy.
At 7:30 last night, Kavanaugh published a Wall Street Journal op-ed, entitled I Am an Independent, Impartial Judge in an effort to save his controversial nomination and undo the damage of his angry and unhinged testimony from last week. In a move that would be deemed utterly unacceptable if Kavanaugh were a woman, he acknowledged he was “too emotional” when he appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee, but stopped short of offering an actual apology.
It’s not entirely surprising — though completely unprecedented — that Kavanaugh felt the need to save face. After all, when you’ve lost the support of lifelong Republican and former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens over the highly inappropriate demeanor during your testimony, well, it’s time to do some damage control.
But with the confirmation vote looming, one has to wonder if it is the proverbial day late and a dollar short. At this point, the fate of Kavanaugh’s career is in the the hands of only a few undecided senators, and it’s unclear if the ploy changed their minds.
And the op-ed was definitely a move to try and shore up 50 votes. As Maya Wiley notes on Twitter, the non-apology only came after an FBI investigation and former supporters started questioning his behavior:
This “apology” would be more meaningful if it came last week- not after almost 2000 law professors, a former #SCOTUS Justice & even some of his supporters said he did not have the temperament to be confirmed: “#Brett Kavanaugh just admitted he screwed up” https://t.co/LH9LR9wIZg
— Maya Wiley (@mayawiley) October 5, 2018
As folks were quick to call out, it had the smack of a public relations move and not an authentic apology.
https://twitter.com/MollyJongFast/status/1048162751942742016
A clip of my thoughts on the #Kavanaugh op/ed on @AC360
CNN panel slam Brett Kavanaugh over 'public relations' apology letter 'to convince people that he’s not unhinged' https://t.co/1WkwuRNjKu
— Tara Setmayer (曆曆 meet me there!) (@TaraSetmayer) October 5, 2018
And then there were the disturbing similarities between Kavanaugh’s op-ed and the language of abusers. This is a man accused by multiple people of sexual assault, and the parallels to the language and tactics of abusers are unsettling.
Brett Kavanaugh's op-ed is written in the language of every abuser: lash out in anger, apologize for that anger, blame outside influences for that anger, promise that's not "who you are" and you'll be better about your anger.
Repeat.
— Danielle Campoamor (@DCampoamor) October 5, 2018
I'm surprised that op-ed apology Kavanaugh wrote didn't come with a bouquet of flowers and a box of chocolates.
— Myandra, Graceless Lady Wicked Merry and Trite (@naughtywriter2) October 5, 2018
#Kavanaugh Op-Ed was eerily similar to the “I’m sorry baby it won’t happen again, I didn’t mean to” line that abusers use. Until it happens again. And again… @SenatorCollins @lisamurkowski @JoeManchinWV @JeffFlake don’t let him fool you. #KavaNo
— ShellB (@Mbathg8) October 5, 2018
He was always sorry if he'd gotten too angry but if he did it was definitely not his fault and probably mine.
Yeah, Kavanaugh's op-ed reads a lot like that.https://t.co/1oX8v808Qc— Fiddler (@cFidd) October 5, 2018
There was definitely a reason for Kavanaugh’s performance and he may have gotten exactly what he needed from the display of anger, and now, in the cold light of day, he is offering acknowledgement, if not actual sorrow, over the tactics he used to get his dream job.
This is what I don’t get about his WSJ op-ed. Angry/partisan Kavanaugh wasn’t spur-of-the-moment; it was in prepared remarks. Sincere though it may have been, also seemed part of a strategy to rally the base – which worked
— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) October 5, 2018
But did it work? Axios is reporting that as of late last night, the GOP did not have 50 yes votes. With the first procedural vote scheduled for 10:30 a.m. this morning, we’ll find out soon enough if this performance was enough.
Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).