Judge Makes Jaw-Dropping Comments On Women In The Judiciary
One judge's controversial comments on seeing more women judges.
One judge's controversial comments on seeing more women judges.
Harry Potter, college football, and 420 [cough] come together for a most excellent judicial footnote.
With the addition of Uncover’s technology, the litigation software is delivering rapid innovation.
What on earth did this judge say to get him suspended?
She had to spend three days in an intensive care unit for severe alcohol intoxication...
In a sense, Wade McCree is a symbol of everything that's wrong with Detroit.
What could have possibly earned this judge a six-year suspension from the bench?
Explore the mindset, cultural shifts, and training strategies that define the AI‑savvy lawyer, revealing why human judgment, standardized competence, and integrated learning—not technology alone—will shape the future of the profession.
A judge has had just about enough of defense lawyers accusing him of bias.
Judicial bias, one racist email at a time.
New Yorkers: go vote today, there are lots of interesting ballot issues in play.
A judge could face disciplinary charges after castigating a jury. And this isn't even her first questionable act.
LexisNexis sat down with John Ursin, Managing Partner at Schenck Price, to learn how the firm is using legal AI to strengthen client service and daily legal work.
This judge allegedly started an intimate, sexual relationship with an exotic dancer. Of course she was appearing in his courtroom!
Heeeeeee's baaaack. Everyone's favorite Judge of the Day testified at his misconduct hearing.
Let's see if this judge has got any "shame in [his] game" now, shall we?
* To those of you who celebrate it, Happy Easter! Welcome the holiday by voting in the ABA Journal’s fifth annual “Peeps in Law” contest. [ABA Journal] * If law firm brackets aren’t your thing, check out Professor Kyle Graham’s brackets for (1) law school classes and (2) law blogs. I’m thankful for ATL’s #1 seed but terrified by who we’re up against (because they’ve ripped me a new one before). [noncuratlex] * Sorry, Judge Steiner, you wuz robbed; you should have been our Judge of the Day. It’s tough to top “allegations of a sexual quid pro quo with a female lawyer and the eye-opening confiscation of carpet from [chambers] for forensic analysis.” [OC Weekly] William Shatner * “William Shatner’s Seductive Powers Don’t Create a Fiduciary Duty.” Robyn Hagan Cain explains why. [U.S. Second Circuit / FindLaw] * Citi settles securities cases for $730 million. Matt Levine is not impressed. [Dealbreaker] * And Ted Frank is incensed by Bernstein Litowitz’s nine-figure fee request. [Point of Law] * If you’re already depressed by public ignorance about the Supreme Court, don’t look at the responses to question 9 of this opinion poll. [Penn Schoen Berland] * Steven Harper — author of a new (and very good) book about the legal profession, The Lawyer Bubble (affiliate link) — offers thoughts on the billable hour in the wake of the DLA Piper overbilling allegations. [New York Times]
Whatever happened to that crazy screaming West Virginia judge?