* All the awesome things that Republicans have said about Merrick Garland. [Mic]
* A deep dive into the record of Chief Judge Garland, and it just might encourage Democrats who are worried that “moderate” is the most used descriptor for the jurist. [New York Times]
* The violence in this cycle’s electoral process may only appear historic in retrospect, and by then, it may be too late. [Medium]
Legal Is Changing. And NeoSummit Is Where The Future Is Being Built.
Legal and operational leaders are gathering May 6–7 in Fort Lauderdale to confront the questions the industry hasn't answered—with a keynote from Amanda Knox setting the tone.
* This is why we should all care about and support Chief Judge Garland’s nomination. [Slate]
* Analyzing Chief Judge Garland’s decision in SpeechNow v. FCC does not provide a reliable bellwether as to how he’d vote in a future campaign finance case. [Election Law Blog]
* The jury asks a female editor a shockingly sexist question during the Hulk Hogan v. Gawker trial. [Vox]
LexisNexis Practical Guidance Rolls Out Dedicated Practice Area for AI & Technology
The new generation of AI-related legal issues are inherently cross-disciplinary, implicating corporate law, intellectual property, data privacy, employment, corporate governance and regulatory compliance.
* Fun mashup of Hamilton, the musical, and Donald Trump. [YouTube]