Well, one of the many things we learned this week is how practically all the pollsters and their fancy data models turned out to be inaccurate to the point of being worse than useless. But here at ATL, we managed to underperform them all. Some readers might recall that we ran a little “Electoral Law School” survey on the site on Tuesday. Sure, lawyers and law students are hardly representative of the populace generally. And perhaps our little exercise was not a model of scientific rigor. But we did take steps to prevent ballot stuffing and our sample size was decent, with 2,000 responses. So our final tally was simply breathtaking in its irrelevant bubbliciousness:
Clinton: 78.07%
Trump: 10.72%
Johnson: 10.13%
Stein: 1.07%
Let us know if you find a more wrong thing anywhere.
Protégé™ In CourtLink® Explains The Whole Case Faster
Designed to reduce manual docket work by prioritizing what litigators need most: on-demand full docket summarization that explains the whole case to date, followed by on-demand document summaries for filing triage, and AI-powered natural language searching for faster search and retrieval.
Brian Dalton is the director of research for Breaking Media. Feel free to email him with any questions or comments.