Just how high will signing bonuses for Supreme Court clerks go? It was just last summer that the going the market rate rose to a new peak — $350,000 — but it’s now been confirmed that $400,000 is now the prevailing rate. Yes, you’re reading that correctly. Biglaw firms and prestigious boutiques are now willing to pay former Supreme Court clerks almost half a million dollars in bonus money just for signing on the dotted line, on top of their base salaries and regular bonuses. Former SCOTUS clerks are making almost double their Supreme bosses’ salaries. This is crazy.
We first hinted at this trend back in August, when my colleague David Lat mentioned that at least six firms — Jones Day, Kirkland & Ellis, Orrick, Paul Weiss, Skadden Arps, and Susman Godfrey — were offering $400,000 bonuses to their SCOTUS clerk recruits. Michael Scanlon, hiring partner at Gibson Dunn, now confirms that “the market appears to have settled” at $400K.
Court-watchers are having trouble believing Biglaw firms are willing to pay this much money just for a new associate’s résumé line, and some have even suggested that ethics rules be consulted. Tony Mauro of the National Law Journal has the details:
The Hidden Threat: How Fake Identities used by Remote Employees Put Your Business at Risk—and How to Defend Against This
Based on our experience in recent client matters, we have seen an escalating threat posed by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) information technology (IT) workers engaging in sophisticated schemes to evade US and UN sanctions, steal intellectual property from US companies, and/or inject ransomware into company IT environments, in support of enhancing North Korea’s illicit weapons program.
“It’s become absurd,” said Todd Peppers, who has written books about Supreme Court clerks. “These firms can no longer credibly argue that they are compensating these former clerks for the additional education and training obtained during their Supreme Court clerkships. Yes, these former clerks are very smart. That being said, this is about access and insight into the individual chambers.”
U.C. Hastings College of the Law professor Rory Little, himself a former clerk, said, “If I were a clerk today and knew that I could get an extra almost half-million dollars, I would feel very careful about the firms’ Supreme Court cases while clerking. Seriously, an ethics expert needs to look at this carefully, under the current ethics rules and concerns we adopt for lawyers and judges in other situations. All 37 clerks or more feel that same ‘tug,’ even if it is implicit or unconscious.”
More clerks at one firm than at any other may be feeling that “tug” right now, and that’s because Jones Day just emerged victoriously from this year’s wooing of the SCOTUS clerks, having cornered the market after hiring 11 of them. That’s a $4.4 million investment in signing bonuses alone for a group of new hires who may wind up taking the money and running after just a few years at the firm.
As noted by Harvard Law School professor Richard Lazarus, “Jones Day is paying a lot of money for a photograph.” Oof, Jones Day needs to open up a personal injury practice group for that sick burn. Luckily for the firm, there’s a pretty big chance it’ll be staffed by some highly intelligent Supreme Court clerks.
If you know that your firm is paying $400,000 for SCOTUS clerks, email us (subject line: “SCOTUS Clerkship Bonuses”) or text us (646-820-8477), and we’ll compile a list of every firm that’s paying so generously for talent of Supreme proportions.
Gen AI: Your Legal Research Assistant, Not Your Replacement
Here's how you can spend more time practicing law, and less time sorting, sifting, and summarizing.
$400K for SCOTUS Clerks: A Bonus Too Far? [National Law Journal]
Staci Zaretsky is a senior editor at Above the Law, where she’s worked since 2011. She’d love to hear from you, so please feel free to email her with any tips, questions, comments, or critiques. You can follow her on Twitter or connect with her on LinkedIn.