* Can the outrage of strip searching a 4-year-old get the Supreme Court to rethink qualified immunity? Well, killing and torturing people hasn’t done it so it’s not clear why this would. [National Law Journal]
* Clifford Chance is the latest firm to deliver a bodyblow to the billable hour. [Law.com]
* Dahlia Lithwick lays out a case that Democrats can focus on impeaching Trump and winning in 2020 too that elides any attention to the ways that the former would likely significantly undermine the latter.
[Slate]
Legal Is Changing. And NeoSummit Is Where The Future Is Being Built.
Legal and operational leaders are gathering May 6–7 in Fort Lauderdale to confront the questions the industry hasn't answered—with a keynote from Amanda Knox setting the tone.
* Pepe’s Revenge: The artist behind the cartoon that’s become the emblem of white supremacy is headed to trial to assert his rights over the image — specifically the rights of racist groups to sell the image on their own posters. [Courthouse News Service]
* A look back at Ted Bundy’s trial skills. [Esquire]
* Jurors asked if schools can be “willfully ignorant” of recruiting violations. It’s probably fair to point out that most are “willfully aware.” [Law360]
LexisNexis Practical Guidance Rolls Out Dedicated Practice Area for AI & Technology
The new generation of AI-related legal issues are inherently cross-disciplinary, implicating corporate law, intellectual property, data privacy, employment, corporate governance and regulatory compliance.
* Deloitte joins fellow accounting firms in dipping its toe into the U.S. legal industry. [American Lawyer]
* In-house attorney loses age discrimination suit. [Corporate Counsel]