* Can the outrage of strip searching a 4-year-old get the Supreme Court to rethink qualified immunity? Well, killing and torturing people hasn’t done it so it’s not clear why this would. [National Law Journal]
* Clifford Chance is the latest firm to deliver a bodyblow to the billable hour. [Law.com]
* Dahlia Lithwick lays out a case that Democrats can focus on impeaching Trump and winning in 2020 too that elides any attention to the ways that the former would likely significantly undermine the latter.
[Slate]
Schenck Price Works Smarter with Lexis+ AI and Protégé
LexisNexis sat down with John Ursin, Managing Partner at Schenck Price, to learn how the firm is using legal AI to strengthen client service and daily legal work.
* Pepe’s Revenge: The artist behind the cartoon that’s become the emblem of white supremacy is headed to trial to assert his rights over the image — specifically the rights of racist groups to sell the image on their own posters. [Courthouse News Service]
* A look back at Ted Bundy’s trial skills. [Esquire]
* Jurors asked if schools can be “willfully ignorant” of recruiting violations. It’s probably fair to point out that most are “willfully aware.” [Law360]
AI Built for Litigation. Verified by Design.
Grounded in authoritative content and verified at every step, Protégé is the only legal AI tool that delivers work you can trust—without exception.
* Deloitte joins fellow accounting firms in dipping its toe into the U.S. legal industry. [American Lawyer]
* In-house attorney loses age discrimination suit. [Corporate Counsel]