
(Photo by MELINA MARA/AFP/Getty Images)
Maybe you spent the weekend enjoying the early fall weather or just spent time watching football or with your friends and family and were able to avoid the New York Times’ recent article about the allegations of Deborah Ramirez against Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh. If so, lucky you. But with the cold light of Monday morning comes the reckoning of news from the world you missed over the weekend, and that includes more news of alleged sexual misconduct by the nation’s newest member of the Supreme Court.
Ramirez’s allegations aren’t new — Kavanaugh denied them, along with the explosive allegation of attempted rape made by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, during his confirmation hearing. But the Times article digs deeper into the alleged incident:
What Even Is AI ‘Competence’? It Depends.
Takeaways from a Legalweek panel on evolving malpractice risks.
During the winter of her freshman year, a drunken dormitory party unsettled her deeply. She and some classmates had been drinking heavily when, she says, a freshman named Brett Kavanaugh pulled down his pants and thrust his penis at her, prompting her to swat it away and inadvertently touch it. Some of the onlookers, who had been passing around a fake penis earlier in the evening, laughed.
To Ms. Ramirez it wasn’t funny at all. It was the nadir of her first year, when she often felt insufficiently rich, experienced or savvy to mingle with her more privileged classmates.
The Times also documents the lack of an investigation into Ramirez’s allegations, indeed, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse said Ramirez’s allegations were not “even remotely investigated.” The F.B.I. didn’t follow up with any of the corroborating evidence Ramirez gave them due to the limitations on the investigation placed by Republicans in the Senate:
Ms. Ramirez’s legal team gave the F.B.I. a list of at least 25 individuals who may have had corroborating evidence. But the bureau — in its supplemental background investigation — interviewed none of them, though we learned many of these potential witnesses tried in vain to reach the F.B.I. on their own.
Two F.B.I. agents interviewed Ms. Ramirez, telling her that they found her “credible.” But the Republican-controlled Senate had imposed strict limits on the investigation. “‘We have to wait to get authorization to do anything else,’” Bill Pittard, one of Ms. Ramirez’s lawyers, recalled the agents saying. “It was almost a little apologetic.”
But as other people have already pointed out, there’s another, potentially even more noteworthy, tidbit buried in the Times piece — Ramirez’s story isn’t the only sexual misconduct allegation from Kavanaugh’s drunken college days:
Most Law Firms’ AI Strategies Have a Big Blind Spot. Here’s How One Am Law 200 Firm is Solving It.
Most law firms, big and small, that have adopted AI are making the same mistake: they bought a tool for their lawyers and called it a strategy.
We also uncovered a previously unreported story about Mr. Kavanaugh in his freshman year that echoes Ms. Ramirez’s allegation. A classmate, Max Stier, saw Mr. Kavanaugh with his pants down at a different drunken dorm party, where friends pushed his penis into the hand of a female student. Mr. Stier, who runs a nonprofit organization in Washington, notified senators and the F.B.I. about this account, but the F.B.I. did not investigate and Mr. Stier has declined to discuss it publicly. (We corroborated the story with two officials who have communicated with Mr. Stier.)
These new and uninvestigated allegations have sparked calls for his impeachment from three Democratic presidential hopefuls, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris and Julian Castro:
Last year the Kavanaugh nomination was rammed through the Senate without a thorough examination of the allegations against him. Confirmation is not exoneration, and these newest revelations are disturbing. Like the man who appointed him, Kavanaugh should be impeached.
— Elizabeth Warren (@ewarren) September 15, 2019
I sat through those hearings. Brett Kavanaugh lied to the U.S. Senate and most importantly to the American people. He was put on the Court through a sham process and his place on the Court is an insult to the pursuit of truth and justice.
He must be impeached.
— Kamala Harris (@KamalaHarris) September 15, 2019
It’s more clear than ever that Brett Kavanaugh lied under oath. He should be impeached.
And Congress should review the failure of the Department of Justice to properly investigate the matter. https://t.co/Yg1eh0CkNl
— Julián Castro (@JulianCastro) September 15, 2019
Unsurprisingly, Donald Trump went on a Twitter spree on Sunday defending Kavanaugh:
Can’t let Brett Kavanaugh give Radical Left Democrat (Liberal Plus) Opinions based on threats of Impeaching him over made up stories (sound familiar?), false allegations, and lies. This is the game they play. Fake and Corrupt News is working overtime! #ProtectKavanaugh
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 15, 2019
He also said the “Justice Department should come to [Kavanaugh’s] rescue”:
Brett Kavanaugh should start suing people for libel, or the Justice Department should come to his rescue. The lies being told about him are unbelievable. False Accusations without recrimination. When does it stop? They are trying to influence his opinions. Can’t let that happen!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 15, 2019
Which would seem to require an investigation, the very thing the GOP prevented when the allegations were first made.
Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, and host of The Jabot podcast. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).