Law Professor Responds To Supreme Court Leak With Racist Commentary. Gee, I Wonder Which Law School...
Why are we not surprised?
Justice Sonia Sotomayor who has no time for this nonsense. (Photo by ERIN SCHAFF/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
[UPDATE: The dean has issued a response, reproduced below]
In fairness, there are a few law schools that could have a professor with thumbs furiously typing out racist garbage on social media. But as much as I appreciate an underdog, some days you just have to play the odds and put your faith in the sure thing.
Legal AI: 3 Steps Law Firms Should Take Now
So a law school that contorted its public school mission (in a not-so-appropriate manner) to become the Kamar-Taj of right-wing legal academia, gathering conservative legal academics left behind by the bankruptcy of their wares on the marketplace of ideas, and then giving itself a facially laughable name in a misguided effort to feed the cult of their hero? Yeah, let’s guess ASSLaw.
And that’s the right answer! George Mason University School of Law, rebranded as the Antonin Scalia School of Law before everyone pointed out how abbreviations work (they belatedly tried to make Antonin Scalia Law School a thing — it’s not), is exactly the institution you have to check first when your tipster subject is “Law professor writes racist tweet over SCOTUS leak.”
Hey, that’s just what they call academic freedom and free speech when you’re an ASSClown!
Let’s check in on ASSLaw Professor Frank Buckley:
Sponsored
The Business Case For AI At Your Law Firm
Navigating Financial Success by Avoiding Common Pitfalls and Maximizing Firm Performance
Legal AI: 3 Steps Law Firms Should Take Now
Early Adopters Of Legal AI Gaining Competitive Edge In Marketplace
Before we get to the substance of this, note that he’s feeding the focus on “the leak,” an overt propagandizing ploy that even non-partisan lawyers are falling into. We broke all that down here… you should read this, it’s OK, we’ll wait until you’re done.
Back to this Tweet. “Stupid Latina” obviously continues the right-wing fascination with casting Sotomayor as unintelligent based on… nothing? This is an established conservative talking point dating back to her confirmation and doggedly carried forward by other professorial racists.
But with racism, like jazz, it’s the stuff you don’t say. Buckley muses that it could be basically any conservative or Sotomayor. Breyer and Kagan are off the table because they don’t fit the — conscious or unconscious — need to attack the minority woman on the Court. She’s the one his social media buddies will all accept as “stupid” because she’s a minority and they all know that minority judges are “lesser.”
Speaking of the “lesser” epithet, the highest realization of the racist art form at play here comes from Newsmax, suggesting that the leak is Ketanji Brown Jackson despite not being on the Supreme Court at all.
Sponsored
Early Adopters Of Legal AI Gaining Competitive Edge In Marketplace
Is The Future Of Law Distributed? Lessons From The Tech Adoption Curve
Earlier today, Professor Buckley tried some backtracking:
Not to besmirch the power of apology, but it’s hard to shake the feeling that, not unlike the leak-obsessed Supreme Court, the professor is more sorry about being caught.
Because there’s a pattern at play here. He’s out here talking about the importance of Confederate statues:
That Tweet is, for now, still up. I say “for now” because it seems like a number of Tweets captured by tipsters aren’t there anymore. Like this one mocking LGBTQ rights:
There are others glibly making fun of systemic racism, but you get the idea. One student noted that Buckley “repeatedly made sexist/racist/ableist/etc statements in class this year that the school claimed it couldn’t do anything about” and another has reached out to the administration to say:
This evening, Professor Buckley willfully disgraced the institution of George Mason Law School. Between his apparent racism and bigotry on display through his myriad of tweets, his inherent biases are visible for all to see. I have added those and left of the half-naked pictures, for your sake. This is the second instance of bigotry, racial slurs, and demeaning behavior from GMU faculty this semester alone. While your office chose not to act on the first instance, since this one is more public, I hope you will take it seriously.
Spoiler alert: they won’t. If private institutions with no ideological dog in the hunt can’t fire professors for spouting off about white nationalism on cable television, a public school — with all the speech and labor protections public employment enjoys — explicitly dedicated to the memory of the guy who said African-American students need to go to “slower-track school” isn’t going to do anything.
The only recourse is to keep calling out this behavior when it happens. They’ll whine about “cancel culture,” but that’s because they have to give a disparaging name to the proper working of a free society. Free speech means that the government can’t pick sides, not that you have to be a docile bullshit sponge. You can bring notoriety to their comments, petition their facilitators to stop, or organize protests against them — that’s free speech too. Don’t let anyone rewrite that concept.
In the meantime, ASSLaw has another embarrassing faculty incident to add to its collection. Unfortunately, the school seems to think these events are features and not bugs.
UPDATE: Here’s what the Dean Ken Randall has to say:
Dear Scalia Law School Community:
Last night one of our colleagues, Professor Frank Buckley, sent a tweet from his personal account that uses language not reflective of the law school’s or the University’s values. I have received many emails expressing upset, hurt, and concern. Many of us found the language discourteous and racially insensitive at best. I contacted the professor very early this morning, by which time he had sent a second tweet expressed as an apology and then deleted the first tweet.
I am grateful to all members of the Scalia Law community who have reached out to me and other administrators at the school to share their concerns. The executive team is meeting and fully reviewing this matter.
Our school is specially committed to open and robust dialogue and to the open marketplace of substantive ideas. The language used by the professor does not conform to the faculty commitment to open dialogue and debate. The way in which we express our ideas is critical to our academic environment. In this instance, the language of these tweets fails to meet the high standards we all respect and promote, and it directly contravenes both our individual and the institutional commitment to build diversity, equity, and inclusion. Racism, or any demonstrated intolerance for an individual because of their identity, has no place at Scalia Law.
The professor and I have spoken again this afternoon. I received the following from him: “I regret that my foolish remarks have caused great sadness. I fully support the principle of inclusion and respect for every student.”
As dean of our law school, I am deeply committed to leading a school devoted to diversity, equity, and inclusion and respectful dialogue and debate. To that end, I make myself fully available to you. Please continue to email me or call me [number redacted]
Ken Randall
Allison and Dorothy Rouse Dean
GMU Foundation Professor of Law
Antonin Scalia Law School
George Mason University
Joe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.
