Constitutional Law

What Was The Part Of The First Amendment ACB Forgot? Yeah, That Part Is In Danger.

The right to protest? Oh! I think you mean Pro Test. The Founding Fathers were really big on hormonal supplements. That's why they were so infatuated with people having Bear Arms.

By  
on
Senate Holds Confirmation Hearing For Amy Coney Barrett To Be Supreme Court Justice

(Photo by Tom Williams-Pool/Getty Images)

When it comes to the First Amendment, we are living in interesting times. Between Bremerton, Alito’s fun little tirade, and the nuanced case that is Yeshiva, we appear to be in the middle of a new age of religious freedom jurisprudence. The other aspects of the First, namely the right to protest, maybe not so much.

Republican-led legislatures have passed anti-protest laws drafted by an extreme right corporate lobbying group in a third of all American states since 2018, as part of a backlash against Indigenous communities and environmentalists opposing fossil fuel projects, new research has found.

The American Legislative Exchange Council (Alec) helped draft legislation criminalizing grassroots protests against pipelines, gas terminals and other oil and gas expansion projects in 24 states, under the guise of protecting critical infrastructure…The anti-protest bills, which were rolled out in response to the success of mostly Indigenous-led campaigns slowing down fossil-fuel infrastructure projects, have used intentionally vague language to create a chilling effect on free speech and assembly – both constitutionally protected rights, according to the report Critical Infrastructure Laws: A Threat to Protest & the Planet.

This is the part where I respond with “They can’t keep getting away with this!” That is, of course, until I remember the looming case that will likely do away with the whole fair elections thing. It would appear that unless you have your right to oppose couched in some niche legal argument, the First just doesn’t have the same protections that it used to. And no, not the “Protect Our Sacred River” type of religiosity. No, this is clearly a Judeo-Christian sort of deal.

Across the pond, there has been a recent quashing of free speech.

It is easy to look over at our neighbor’s lawn and see weeds growing, but those issues will be ours as well if we don’t nip homegrown censorship in the bud. Democratic societies, real ones anyway, require room for agonistic voicing of concerns and standpoints. Regulating actions is one thing, but the regulation of thinking and assembly that doesn’t serve the interests of monied companies isn’t the sort of thing that a free people should be willing to stomach.

Sponsored

If push comes to shove, you should know how to respond if the police decide to silence your protesting.

Revealed: Rightwing US Lobbyists Help Craft Slew Of Anti-Protest Fossil Fuel Bills [The Guardian]

Chris Williams became a social media manager and assistant editor for Above the Law in June 2021. Prior to joining the staff, he moonlighted as a minor Memelord™ in the Facebook group Law School Memes for Edgy T14s.  He endured Missouri long enough to graduate from Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. He is a former boatbuilder who cannot swim, a published author on critical race theory, philosophy, and humor, and has a love for cycling that occasionally annoys his peers. You can reach him by email at cwilliams@abovethelaw.com and by tweet at @WritesForRent.

Sponsored

Topics

, ,