Designing For The Rulebook: How AI Compliance Can Drive Smarter Innovation

Whenever new AI laws are introduced, the reaction in many companies is predictable: frustration, concern, and a scramble to adjust. Regulation is often cast as the adversary of innovation, the red tape that slows launches and burdens teams. In reality, legal frameworks can serve as design tools. When used intentionally, they can shape AI products that are not only compliant but also more competitive and resilient.

Seeing The Law As A Design Partner

Compliance has traditionally been treated as a final step before launch, a box to tick once the system is built. That approach is risky. For AI in particular, many of the requirements embedded in new regulations, from explainability to bias monitoring, influence the product’s core structure. Ignoring them until the end means expensive redesigns and missed opportunities.

If counsel is involved from the earliest design discussions, those same requirements become part of the creative process. The legal framework becomes less of a roadblock and more of a set of guiding lines, pushing the product toward safer and more marketable outcomes.

Turning Boundaries Into Breakthroughs

Some of the most interesting AI features emerge directly from regulatory requirements. If the law says your AI must be explainable, your team might develop intuitive user interfaces or clearer decision logs, both of which improve user experience. If bias testing is mandated, you might invest in richer datasets or better evaluation methods, improving model accuracy overall. Privacy constraints can lead to innovations in synthetic data or federated learning that make the product faster and more secure.

These improvements are not side benefits. They are market advantages. In a competitive field, the product that can prove it is safe, transparent, and fair is the one that earns user trust.

Building Compliance Into The DNA

The real shift happens when compliance is embedded in the development process, not bolted on at the end. That means counsel understanding the technology well enough to translate legal obligations into engineering goals. It also means engineers seeing compliance not as an external burden but as a parameter to design within.

This collaboration prevents the common scenario where a nearly finished system needs major rework to meet a regulation. Instead, the product is launch-ready both legally and technically, with no last-minute compromises.

The Competitive Advantage Of Being Ready

AI markets move fast, but regulatory change is accelerating too. A company that reacts to new laws only after they pass is already behind. The teams that anticipate likely requirements, design with them in mind, and keep counsel engaged throughout are positioned to move quickly and confidently when the rules take effect.

From a business perspective, this reduces the risk of enforcement actions, product delays, or reputational damage. From an innovation perspective, it pushes teams to think more deeply and creatively about the product’s structure and capabilities.

Shaping The Future Responsibly

The assumption that rules and innovation cannot coexist belongs to an earlier era of technology. In the AI space, regulation is helping define what responsible, sustainable products look like. Those who embrace that reality will not only keep pace with compliance but will also lead in building systems the public and regulators can trust.

For in-house counsel, this is an opportunity to shift the conversation from “what do we have to change to comply” to “how can these requirements make our product better.” That is where compliance becomes more than a safeguard. It becomes a driver of innovation.

---

Olga V. Mack is the CEO of TermScout, an AI-powered contract certification platform that accelerates revenue and eliminates friction by certifying contracts as fair, balanced, and market-ready. A serial CEO and legal tech executive, she previously led a company through a successful acquisition by LexisNexis. Olga is also a Fellow at CodeX, The Stanford Center for Legal Informatics, and the Generative AI Editor at law.MIT. She is a visionary executive reshaping how we law—how legal systems are built, experienced, and trusted. Olga teaches at Berkeley Law, lectures widely, and advises companies of all sizes, as well as boards and institutions. An award-winning general counsel turned builder, she also leads early-stage ventures including Virtual Gabby (Better Parenting Plan), Product Law Hub, ESI Flow, and Notes to My (Legal) Self, each rethinking the practice and business of law through technology, data, and human-centered design. She has authored The Rise of Product Lawyers, Legal Operations in the Age of AI and Data, Blockchain Value, and Get on Board, with Visual IQ for Lawyers (ABA) forthcoming. Olga is a 6x TEDx speaker and has been recognized as a Silicon Valley Woman of Influence and an ABA Woman in Legal Tech. Her work reimagines people’s relationship with law—making it more accessible, inclusive, data-driven, and aligned with how the world actually works. She is also the host of the Notes to My (Legal) Self podcast (streaming on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, and YouTube), and her insights regularly appear in Forbes, Bloomberg Law, Newsweek, VentureBeat, ACC Docket, and Above the Law. She earned her B.A. and J.D. from UC Berkeley. Follow her on LinkedIn and X @olgavmack.