From document review to legal research, AI tools promise increased efficiency and reduced costs.
But as law firms rush to adopt these technologies, an important question arises: Are we sacrificing long-term expertise for short-term gains?
LexisNexis Practical Guidance Rolls Out Dedicated Practice Area for AI & Technology
The new generation of AI-related legal issues are inherently cross-disciplinary, implicating corporate law, intellectual property, data privacy, employment, corporate governance and regulatory compliance.
In a recent episode of Adventures in Legal Tech, attorney Harshita Ganesh joins host Jared Correia for a nuanced discussion of AI adoption in law firms.
The Rise of “Shadow AI”
One of the most concerning trends in law firms today is the rise of “shadow AI.”
Junior associates, often overwhelmed by heavy workloads and tight deadlines, are turning to unauthorized AI tools to manage their responsibilities. Here, Harshita weighs in on the problem.
Protégé™ In CourtLink® Explains The Whole Case Faster
Designed to reduce manual docket work by prioritizing what litigators need most: on-demand full docket summarization that explains the whole case to date, followed by on-demand document summaries for filing triage, and AI-powered natural language searching for faster search and retrieval.
The Risk of Cognitive Offloading
AI excels at handling repetitive tasks, but not all tasks should be automated.
Harshita says that, over time, this can lead to a generation of attorneys who lack the depth of understanding needed for high-level strategy and decision-making.
A Better Approach to AI Adoption
Instead of rushing into full-scale implementation, Harshita advocates for a gradual and thoughtful approach.
Importantly, the focus is not on replacing people — but on redefining roles. Here, Harshita explains her approach.
The Future of Legal Practice
AI is neither a threat nor a solution on its own.
Its impact will depend on how law firms choose to integrate it into their workflows. Those that prioritize balance—between efficiency and education, automation and judgment—will be best positioned to succeed.
The future of law is not just about smarter tools. It’s about smarter implementation.
See the Full Discussion