Morning Docket

Morning Docket: 03.14.16

* Now that the Supreme Court shortlist has been whittled down to just three appellate judges, people are speculating as to whether we're on track to see our first Asian-American nominee. Sri Srinivasan, the front-runner whose "ethnic identity would be the real novel factor here," could be the high court's first Hindu justice. [Washington Post] * Those on the left, however, apparently have objections to Judge Srinivasan's nomination. During his time at both O'Melveny & Myers and the DOJ, he supported companies accused of gross human rights abuses -- a "deeply disturbing" record for someone being considered for SCOTUS. [The Hill] * Oopsie! Somebody wasted $250K! On Friday, Judicial Crisis Network launched an ad campaign against Judge Jane Kelly of the Eighth Circuit's possible nomination to the nation's highest court. You can "[t]ell your senator Jane Kelly doesn't belong on the Supreme Court" all you want, but this is a bit of a moot point now. [POLITICO] * Since "simply claiming that an attorney's conduct was fraudulent does not allow plaintiffs to circumvent attorney immunity," the Fifth Circuit tossed a suit alleging that Proskauer Rose and Chadbourne & Parke helped to conceal R. Allen Stanford's $7.2B Ponzi scheme. Stanford is serving a 110-year sentence. [Big Law Business / Bloomberg] * You snooze, you lose: "[W]e find it impossible not to conclude that [Nikita] Mackey slept, and was therefore not functioning as a lawyer during a substantial portion of the trial." The Fourth Circuit vacated a man's conviction and 30-year sentence because his lawyer slept "almost every day" of his trial, for at least 30 minutes. [WSJ Law Blog]

By Staci Zaretsky on March 14, 2016 8:56 am
Justice Sri Srinivasan? (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty)

Justice Sri Srinivasan? (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty)

* Now that the Supreme Court shortlist has been whittled down to just three appellate judges, people are speculating as to whether we’re on track to see our first Asian-American nominee. Sri Srinivasan, the front-runner whose “ethnic identity would be the real novel factor here,” could be the high court’s first Hindu justice. [Washington Post]

* Those on the left, however, apparently have objections to Judge Srinivasan’s nomination. During his time at both O’Melveny & Myers and the DOJ, he supported companies accused of gross human rights abuses — a “deeply disturbing” record for someone being considered for SCOTUS. [The Hill]

* Oopsie! Somebody wasted $250K! On Friday, Judicial Crisis Network launched an ad campaign against Judge Jane Kelly of the Eighth Circuit’s possible nomination to the nation’s highest court. You can “[t]ell your senator Jane Kelly doesn’t belong on the Supreme Court” all you want, but this is a bit of a moot point now. [POLITICO]

* Since “simply claiming that an attorney’s conduct was fraudulent does not allow plaintiffs to circumvent attorney immunity,” the Fifth Circuit tossed a suit alleging that Proskauer Rose and Chadbourne & Parke helped to conceal R. Allen Stanford’s $7.2B Ponzi scheme. Stanford is serving a 110-year sentence. [Big Law Business / Bloomberg]

* You snooze, you lose: “[W]e find it impossible not to conclude that [Nikita] Mackey slept, and was therefore not functioning as a lawyer during a substantial portion of the trial.” The Fourth Circuit vacated a man’s conviction and 30-year sentence because his lawyer slept “almost every day” of his trial, for at least 30 minutes. [WSJ Law Blog]