Looking Ahead To 2028
What happens if J.D. Vance is in the position to enforce his 2020 thinking in 2028?
What happens if J.D. Vance is in the position to enforce his 2020 thinking in 2028?
It's hard to say where we go from here.
Legal teams ask a practical question. If large language models are so capable, why does legal AI still depend on curated content, and why does surfacing that content matter so much?
Thanks ... Tom DeLay???
You vote, they lose.
Navigating the Scylla and Charybdis of defamation and sanctions.
Turnout was up, but not exceptional.
Put away the guesswork—Lexis® Verdict & Settlement Analyzer helps legal professionals assess case potential with confidence by using data-driven insights from the industry’s largest collection of verdicts and settlements.
Voter enthusiasm appears to be slightly elevated.
Despite Trump's urgings, you'd be risking possible felonies.
Well, it's 5 o'clock somewhere...
A theory on why Bill Barr is the Attorney General.
Drawing on more than a decade of data, the report equips law firms and corporate legal teams with actionable insights to better assess risk, refine strategy, and anticipate outcomes in today’s evolving workplace disputes.
When did "every vote will be counted" become so controversial?
This is a troubling campaign mailer, but it's also legal.
The defendants 'stamp their feet and wail,' but the judge isn't having any of it.
I don't know what Gill v. Whitford is going to do, but it's going to do all of it.
The assault on the right to vote continues.