When A Crested Macaque Is A Necessary Party: Ninth Circuit Denies Joint Motion To Dismiss Monkey-Selfie Case
Why on earth is this case still in the court system? The Ninth Circuit may be preparing to hand down a very important opinion.
Why on earth is this case still in the court system? The Ninth Circuit may be preparing to hand down a very important opinion.
Insert Ninth Circuit joke here.
Drawing on more than a decade of data, the report equips law firms and corporate legal teams with actionable insights to better assess risk, refine strategy, and anticipate outcomes in today’s evolving workplace disputes.
Sometimes it's hard to figure out what public interest a public interest lawyer serves?
* PETA's general counsel swears his organization isn't monkeying around when it comes to asserting the IP rights of Naruto the selfie-taking monkey, but he may have to deal with a jungle of jurisdictional issues first. [Motherboard / VICE] * Mmmm, Dewey smell a mistrial? On the eighth day of deliberations in the criminal trial of D&L's former leaders, the jurors likely made defense counsels' hearts skip a beat when they asked the judge for instructions on what to do concerning their undecided colleagues. [WSJ Law Blog] * Chief Justice John Roberts, who has voted conservatively in 85 percent of the Supreme Court's most divisive 5-4 decisions, apparently isn't conservative enough for our conservatives. It's the damn Affordable Care Act. Thanks, Obama. [New York Times] * According to the latest Acritas Global Elite Law Firm Brand Index 2015, for the sixth year running, Baker & McKenzie has the most recognizable Biglaw brand in the world. DLA Piper will continue to "churn [those] bill[s], baby!" in second place. [PR Web] * Take the deal: Ex-House Speaker Dennis Hastert, who's accused of hiding large sums used as hush money to conceal his prior sexual misconduct, is negotiating a plea deal with prosecutors. If he were convicted at trial, he'd face up to 10 years in prison. [Reuters]
What to make of this legal theory -- fascinating, or frivolous?
Who owns a picture taken by a monkey?
Legal teams ask a practical question. If large language models are so capable, why does legal AI still depend on curated content, and why does surfacing that content matter so much?