Associate Bonus Watch: Mo’ Money At MoFo
General sentiment about bonuses at Morrison & Foerster is positive.
Can Technology Automate Your Rights? Upsolve Thinks So
A story of legal innovation that should tickle the hearts of all you idealists.
AI Is Reshaping Legal Practice—But Tools Aren’t The Real Differentiator.
Explore the mindset, cultural shifts, and training strategies that define the AI‑savvy lawyer, revealing why human judgment, standardized competence, and integrated learning—not technology alone—will shape the future of the profession.
What Happens To Incoming Biglaw Associates Who Fail The Bar Exam?
Uh-oh! Would they still have jobs with starting salaries of $180K if they failed?
Associate Bonus Watch: Morrison & Foerster (Non-NYC)
How are MoFo's bonuses beyond New York looking these days?
The ATL Interrogatories: 10 Questions with Larren Nashelsky of Morrison & Foerster
Larren Nashelsky of Morrison & Foerster shares his insights into the legal profession.
Associate Bonus (and New Partner) Watch: Morrison & Foerster
Opinion is divided on bonuses at MoFo. Which side has the better of the argument?
How Checkbox’s ‘Legal Front Door’ Can Transform Your Workflow
Leveraging agentic AI to triage, prioritize, and automate the law department inbox.
Morning Docket: 10.19.12
* Congrats to Larren Nashelsky for being one bad ass MoFo. He’s taking over as Chair of Morrison & Foerster, and claims the firm’s had “some of [its] best years in recent years.” [San Francisco Business Times] * Macho, macho man! You’ve got to be, a macho man to work at Dechert. An ex-associate says he was fired for using FMLA time and blames the firm’s “macho culture” in his retaliation complaint. [National Law Journal] * Sorry, but you make too much damn money. Utah’s Judicial Conduct Commission recommended a judge for censure because his salary was “in excess of the amount allowed by law.” [Standard-Examiner] * “We’re all reacting to Darwinian pressures in the market and from students.” Maybe that’s why law schools are adding more classes having to do with careers as in-house counsel. [Corporate Counsel] * Jerry Sandusky has asked Judge John Cleland to reconsider his 30-60 year prison sentence because he thinks it’s excessive. Strange, because some people would argue it wasn’t excessive enough. [Bloomberg]