This Law Review Is Older Than Dirt
The oldest in the nation.
The oldest in the nation.
Jonathan Mitchell and FASORP target another law review.
A new proposal would let wealthy foreign nationals secure an opportunity for a U.S. green card with a $1 million 'gift' to the government, sparking legal and ethical debate.
You could read the email, but be warned: it reads like someone who didn't get onto Law Review wrote it.
Do student-run journals create real-world problems for the shape of the law?
Bluebookers seeing red after some students apparently tried to cheat their way onto law review.
Is anonymized review for prestigious journals helping reduce the elitism bias in the academy?
This Pro Bono Week, get inspired to give back with PLI’s Pursuing Justice: The Pro Bono Files, a one-of-a-kind podcast hosted by Alicia Aiken.
Students want to put an end to law schools' unpaid labor racket.
How did it take over a week for anyone to notice how wildly inappropriate this was?
A very prestigious law review indeed.
Or give them maximum academic credit -- but students want cash.
Those who’ve adopted legal-specific systems are seeing big benefits.
TempDean and LawProfBlawg offer a solution to the law review submission process.
People randomly take their names off articles that they purport to solely author all the time, right?
Over 170 editions of this law review have been published.
Law students cannot survive on prestige alone.
One of the fundamental problems in legal academia is the notion that an article is better if it places better. Would you feel the same way if this were published in a top law review?