What The 2026 FIFA World Cup Taught Us About Global Events
The 2026 FIFA World Cup succeeded because millions of moving parts operated within carefully constructed legal frameworks that most fans never noticed.
The 2026 FIFA World Cup succeeded because millions of moving parts operated within carefully constructed legal frameworks that most fans never noticed.
The thrill in seeing the level of skill and talent on display, on both an individual and team level, was exhilarating.
AI can accelerate document review, but metrics alone aren't enough. Learn how Managing Attorney oversight turns AI-driven review into a more adaptive, strategic and defensible process.
History shows that temporary security measures have a tendency to become permanent.
The agreement does not eliminate all issues.
How much expansion still serves the integrity of the event, and how much simply serves the business model surrounding it?
If a tax is described as targeting visitors but predictably falls on residents, is it still a tourism tax?
Grounded in authoritative content and verified at every step, Protégé is the only legal AI tool that delivers work you can trust—without exception.
There is still time to correct course on this absurdity.
The uncomfortable truth is that 'festival vibes' do not replace serious planning.
When funding freezes threaten readiness, lawmakers should be asking whether the financial architecture matches the security burden.
The 2026 tournament is testing whether a sport that markets itself as borderless can function inside a world of tightening borders and polarized politics.
New executive research from Ari Kaplan explores how law firm leaders are responding to changing client expectations, evolving economics, talent transformation, and AI governance.
The sticker shock is real, but the fine print is where fans lose almost every meaningful right.
* NY prosecutors signal that Donald Trump is about to be indicted. It's probably a misdemeanor for falsifying records to bribe Stormy Daniels into silence, but it's something. [Huffington Post] * Speaking of bribery, the trial of the Fox executives accused of bribing soccer officials results in split verdict. The only proper result for a case about a sport that drags on forever and ends in a draw. [Courthouse News Service] * Alex Murdaugh is appealing his conviction based on... well, the filing doesn't say but I'm sure those crazy kids will come up with something. [The Hill] * Brett Favre's lawyer says his defamation claims against commentators addressing the Mississippi welfare scandal are a "slam dunk." Which is the wrong sport. [Awful Announcing] * DoNotPay hit with class action lawsuit. Maybe the algorithm can defend them here! If the company is willing to bet a million on its ability to win a SCOTUS case, it can surely do this pro se. [CBS News] * DOJ opposing efforts to keep judges from enhancing sentences for minor crime convictions based on allegations where the jury acquitted. See, this is a reason to be furious with Merrick Garland. [Reuters] * Do you still use paper business cards? Should you upgrade to one of the objectively cooler options out there or are you too much of an American Psycho fan to give up paper? [Daily Business Review]
The Biglaw investigation revealed a troubling environment for players.
You've got to take testifying seriously.
Fan lawsuits are the best.