Earlier this week, we asked readers to submit possible captions for this picture:
Let’s have a look at what our readers came up with, and vote on the finalists.
Labor and Employment Federal Litigation Trends 2026
Drawing on more than a decade of data, the report equips law firms and corporate legal teams with actionable insights to better assess risk, refine strategy, and anticipate outcomes in today’s evolving workplace disputes.
Here are the finalists for our latest caption contest, most of which were supremely entertaining (a few with the most “likes” from readers in Disqus, and a few underrated captions that received the most “likes” from me):
A. An aging Katniss and Peeta in the Hunger Games Part 12: Mocking, J.
B. May it please the Court… and Duck Dynasty.
C. Ginsburg should have suspected something was up when her fellow justices started referring to her as “Old Yeller.”
D. “Be vewwy vewwy quiet… We’re hunting for owiginal intent!”
E. So they finally granted cert:
F. When it comes to camouflage, Scalia vigorously dissents.
G. “Hey Scalia — wanna see my Dick Cheney impression?”
H. How much of a head start does the pro se get?
Do you have supreme ambitions (aff. link) of winning? Vote for your favorite caption in our poll, which will be open through SUNDAY, DECEMBER 21, at 11:59 P.M. (EST).
[poll id=”458″]
Context Windows In Legal AI And Why Content Still Determines Quality
Legal teams ask a practical question. If large language models are so capable, why does legal AI still depend on curated content, and why does surfacing that content matter so much?
Earlier: Caption Contest: If It Walks And Talks Like A Duck, These SCOTUS Justices Will Kill It