Morning Docket: 03.30.16

* An odd order? Perhaps in an attempt to avoid yet another 4-4 split in a controversial case, SCOTUS justices have ordered parties on both sides of the contraceptive coverage battle in Zubik to file briefs describing how such coverage could be provided without religious groups having to put forth much effort to formally object. [Associated Press] * "It's mind bogglingly obvious, but often gets lost in the mix. Apart from checking there aren't any conflicts, clients are rarely put at the heart of these mergers." Go figure, but according to a new report by professional services consultancy Gulland Padfield, law firm mergers usually don't benefit clients in any way, shape, or form. [Am Law Daily] * It seems that Russian cybercriminal "Oleras" has hired hackers to break into the computer systems of 48 Biglaw firms so he can collect confidential client data and then trade on the stolen insider information. Thus far, he's been unsuccessful. Has your law firm been targeted? If you'd like to know, check the list here. [Crain's Chicago Business] * The NFL is so pissed that the New York Times recently published a story linking the league to the tobacco industry that it not only wrote a two-part rebuttal that was more than 3000 words long, but it also sicced Paul Weiss attorneys on the paper of record in search of a retraction, claiming that the story was defamatory in nature. [Yahoo! Sports] * "I will not go down. I want Bill Cosby in court." A Los Angeles judge has ruled that model Janice Dickinson's defamation case against Bill Cosby can move forward so that a jury can decide whether her allegations of rape are truthful, and further, whether a "liar" comment made by the comedian's ex-lawyer, Marty Singer, was defamatory. [Telegram]