Non-Sequiturs

Non-Sequiturs: 10.11.16

* Is the Supreme Court being hypocritical? [New York Times] * Free lawyers for the poor actually pay for themselves. [Guile is Good] * A look at how well the federal government fares in front of the Supreme Court. [Empirical SCOTUS] * More legal woes for Theranos. [Law and More] * A great resource for gifts for the lawyer in your life. [Courthouses of America] * The pull of social conservatives in the legal industry. [Bloomberg/BNA]

By Kathryn Rubino on October 11, 2016 7:45 pm

Supreme Court artsy * Is the Supreme Court being hypocritical? [New York Times]

* Free lawyers for the poor actually pay for themselves. [Guile is Good]

* A look at how well the federal government fares in front of the Supreme Court. [Empirical SCOTUS]

AI Is Reshaping Legal Practice—But Tools Aren’t The Real Differentiator.

Explore the mindset, cultural shifts, and training strategies that define the AI‑savvy lawyer, revealing why human judgment, standardized competence, and integrated learning—not technology alone—will shape the future of the profession.

By Barbri

* More legal woes for Theranos. [Law and More]

* A great resource for gifts for the lawyer in your life. [Courthouses of America]

* The pull of social conservatives in the legal industry. [Bloomberg/BNA]