Non-Sequiturs

Non-Sequiturs: 10.11.16

* Is the Supreme Court being hypocritical? [New York Times] * Free lawyers for the poor actually pay for themselves. [Guile is Good] * A look at how well the federal government fares in front of the Supreme Court. [Empirical SCOTUS] * More legal woes for Theranos. [Law and More] * A great resource for gifts for the lawyer in your life. [Courthouses of America] * The pull of social conservatives in the legal industry. [Bloomberg/BNA]

By Kathryn Rubino on October 11, 2016 7:45 pm

Supreme Court artsy * Is the Supreme Court being hypocritical? [New York Times]

* Free lawyers for the poor actually pay for themselves. [Guile is Good]

* A look at how well the federal government fares in front of the Supreme Court. [Empirical SCOTUS]

Protégé™ In CourtLink® Explains The Whole Case Faster

Designed to reduce manual docket work by prioritizing what litigators need most: on-demand full docket summarization that explains the whole case to date, followed by on-demand document summaries for filing triage, and AI-powered natural language searching for faster search and retrieval.

By LexisNexis

* More legal woes for Theranos. [Law and More]

* A great resource for gifts for the lawyer in your life. [Courthouses of America]

* The pull of social conservatives in the legal industry. [Bloomberg/BNA]