Non-Sequiturs

Non-Sequiturs: 10.11.16

* Is the Supreme Court being hypocritical? [New York Times] * Free lawyers for the poor actually pay for themselves. [Guile is Good] * A look at how well the federal government fares in front of the Supreme Court. [Empirical SCOTUS] * More legal woes for Theranos. [Law and More] * A great resource for gifts for the lawyer in your life. [Courthouses of America] * The pull of social conservatives in the legal industry. [Bloomberg/BNA]

By Kathryn Rubino on October 11, 2016 7:45 pm

* Is the Supreme Court being hypocritical? [New York Times]

* Free lawyers for the poor actually pay for themselves. [Guile is Good]

* A look at how well the federal government fares in front of the Supreme Court. [Empirical SCOTUS]

Legal Is Changing. And NeoSummit Is Where The Future Is Being Built.

Legal and operational leaders are gathering May 6–7 in Fort Lauderdale to confront the questions the industry hasn't answered—with a keynote from Amanda Knox setting the tone.

By Neostella

* More legal woes for Theranos. [Law and More]

* A great resource for gifts for the lawyer in your life. [Courthouses of America]

* The pull of social conservatives in the legal industry. [Bloomberg/BNA]