In-House Counsel Say They Want More From Outside Counsel But Don’t Demand It
The more things change ...
The more things change ...
The TR announcement felt a little different.
Explore the mindset, cultural shifts, and training strategies that define the AI‑savvy lawyer, revealing why human judgment, standardized competence, and integrated learning—not technology alone—will shape the future of the profession.
I’m not betting against Apple this time.
Just like with the advent of interstates, an entire culture may be lost.
Let’s not get too comfortable.
Legal work isn’t slowing down, and the firms that win won’t be the ones working harder — they’ll be the ones working smarter.
Several factors got midsize firms to this point.
Using AI in an educational way moves the relationship more to one of a team with a lawyer, client, and AI tools all working together to get better results.
Legal Geek is one of the few conferences that actually stops and tries to holistically figure out what the impact of AI will be.
More sophisticated in-house counsel are not waiting on outside providers to make changes in light of the efficiencies AI and automation can bring.
Law firms and legal departments are writing the future of the profession in separate rooms. What happens when they actually work together?
There’s a potential for greater liability and claims.
We have to start by recognizing that we actually have a problem.
If defense firms aren't keeping up, what were once their advantages may well become liabilities as plaintiffs’ lawyers become more sophisticated.
An educated judge can impose meaningful and appropriate penalties when lines are crossed concerning wearable technology.
The Global Institute is for serious legal ops professionals who want to learn and talk about the issues most relevant to their teams.